Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity Aversion
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity Aversion
Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity Aversion This paper demonstrates gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. It also contributes to a growing literature relating economic preference parameters to psychological measures by asking whether variations in preference parameters among persons, and in particular across genders, can be accounted for by differences in pe...
متن کاملAmbiguity and Ambiguity Aversion
Consider the following choice problem, known as “Ellsberg’s three-color urn example”, or simply the “Ellsberg Paradox” (Ellsberg [7]). An urn contains 30 red balls, and 60 green and blue balls, in unspecified proportions; subjects are asked to compare (i) a bet on a red draw vs. a bet on a green draw, and (ii) a bet on a red or blue draw vs. a bet on a green or blue draw. If the subject wins a ...
متن کاملDecreasing aversion under ambiguity
Under which condition does the set of desirable uncertain prospects expand when wealth increases? We show that the decreasing concavity (DC) of the utility function is necessary and sufficient in the −maxmin expected utility model. In the smooth ambiguity aversion model with the ambiguity valuation function , the DC of and of ◦ is necessary and sufficient. An alternative definition of d...
متن کاملMeasuring Ambiguity Aversion
Loss Set A Set A Set A Set A Investment Set B Set B Set B Set B Insurance Set B Set B Set B Set B Furthermore, the subjects face four different types of information in both decision frames and treatments. The ‘precise’ information frame has exact probabilities and exact payments stated. In the ‘ambiguity in probability’ frames, the probability is stated as a range and the payment is fixed. Conv...
متن کاملInequality aversion and risk aversion
This note shows that for two inequality averse social welfare functions, if one is more inequality averse than the other, the household preference induced by optimally allocating aggregate bundles according to this social welfare function is more risk averse than the other. We present examples showing that this comparative static can be reversed if inequality aversion is dropped. We show that t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of the European Economic Association
سال: 2009
ISSN: 1542-4766,1542-4774
DOI: 10.1162/jeea.2009.7.2-3.649